Search Results

Here's what happened and what comes next AB 762 would ban integrated (all-in-one) cannabis and tobacco Here's the economic reality: using updated consumer data, CaCOA estimates AB 762 would result in approximately You have data about what AB 762 means for your business, your employees, and your customers.  please consider reaching out before January 22nd, so they understand the unintended consequences of AB

AB 762 would ban cannabis retailers from selling any battery-embedded vaporizers: a product category AB 762 is the opposite of what policymakers should want, and California already has a better solution AB 1894, which took effect in July 2024, requires labeling and mandatory consumer education about proper AB 762 dismantles that progress .  serves on the committee, please consider reaching out so they understand the unintended consequences of AB

three urgent cannabis policy priorities: Prevent the Cannabis Excise Tax Increase : Support and pass AB 564 (Haney), which would freeze California's cannabis excise tax at 15% rather than allowing the scheduled The testimony comes at a critical moment as Assembly Bill 564 advances through the California legislature

“AB 8 seeks to protect public health by eliminating access to intoxicating hemp products outside of authorized

new site with advocacy at its core: Action Center : Easily advocate for legislative priorities (e.g., AB 564, halting the excise tax increase, and AB 8, hemp integration) Policy Tracking: Stay updated on bills

, 2025, a change that CaCOA and its members are actively working  to prevent through the passage of AB 564 (Haney).

state’s largest cannabis industry group, has launched an advocacy campaign in support of Assembly Bill 564 A.B. 564 would reset the excise tax at the previous rate of 15%.

Jenkins explained how the industry has united to prevent this tax hike through Assembly Bill 564 (Haney

Assembly Bill 564 , which would set the cannabis excise tax at 15% through the end of June 2031, passed

And so, Assembly Bill 564 was put forward to suspend the 4% tax hike to help the legal market stay afloat

But the bill — A.B.564 , sponsored by Assembly Member Matt Haney (D-SF) — still needs to clear the State

United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Western States Council, also testified in support of A.B. 564